Unconventional Treatments Category

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

Calcium vs cancer

Seeing that there is a general belief that milk is not good for cancer, especially my type of cancer, I thought – what about calcium…?

So off I went to Google “calcium and cancer”.

Lots of info.
Of course.

Appears that many believe that calcium is quite good in the fight for cancer.
But not from milk.
There are plenty of veggies that are rich in calcium

There are those who state that the most important resource for calcium is coral calcium.

Others do not agree…

Be Wary of Coral Calcium and Robert Barefoot

There are also supplements claiming to be coral calcium, which are not, so “buyer beware”.

The National Cancer Institute, a government agency, does not support calcium therapy for cancer. The National Cancer Institute’s views on calcium are pretty much what we have heard for years – get it from milk and it does a body good.

Yes, there are those who “prey” on people like me – who are fighting this horrible battle. In this fight, any extra “bullet” MIGHT make a difference, so I have made the choice to add additional calcium to my supplement list.

Tags: , , ,

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

What Is Cancer? An Alternative View.

The following is information that I found on the website CancerTruth.net.  The information I read is very interesting and in line with the information presented via the “Healing Cancer Friom The Inside Out” video presention that I attended This way of thinking is becoming more and more how I believe – not quite so “radical”, but my way of belief nonetheless. I cannot image anyone not seeing this as a positive difference in thinking, a Positive way to treat.  Tumors are Symptoms of the disease, they should Not be the Primary Targets.  Lets get back to Healing Our Bodies.

What is Cancer?

Conventional medicine defines cancer as a colony of malignant cells, or a tumor. If you have a tumor, then the conventional oncologist will try to cut or slash it out via surgery. After they cut you, then they typically recommend chemo to try to kill any remaining cancer cells with toxic poisons.  And they will finish off with radiation, to burn whatever cancer cells remain.  This is why I, and many others, refer to “the Big 3” protocol as “Slash, Poison, and Burn.”

Alternative medicine sees cancer as a multidimensional, systemic total body disease. The tumor is merely a symptom and the purpose of the alternative cancer treatment is to correct the root causes of cancer in the whole body. 

Why is my Doctor against Alternative Cancer Treatments?

Your doctor is against these treatments because from the first day of medical school, doctors are brainwashed into believing that disease can only be treated with drugs. You can rest assured that your doctor has likely been convinced that the only viable treatments for cancer are chemo, surgery, and radiation.

Most doctors have a tendency to believe that not only what they were taught in medical school must be true, but they also believe that what they were not taught must not be important!  As a result, most doctors are still thinking “inside the box” when it comes to cancer.  Doctors who think “outside the box” and treat the actual cause of disease rather than the symptoms are labeled as “quacks.” 

And if that’s not enough…

…the FDA has a track record of raiding the offices of alternative practitioners, destroying their medical records, and putting them in jail…

In addition, many doctors are afraid of expensive, time consuming lawsuits, and their insurance carrier may drop them if they use alternative treatments. Their state medical boards may fine them and revoke their license.

And remember, doctors are human. Due to the fact that others doctors will publicly ridicule them if they use alternative treatments, many doctors succumb to recommending “the Big 3” as a result of peer pressure. 

Do Alternative Treatments Work?

The evidence that there are literally hundreds of alternative cancer treatments which really do work is beyond voluminous. However, only a precious few treatments are strong enough and act fast enough to effectively treat a cancer patient who has been deemed to be “terminal” by his doctor.

What about tumors? According to Dr. Philip E. Binzel, MD
The problem with many (not all) Doctors and Oncologists in today’s society is that they have been trained to be ‘tumor orientated’ … For example, when a patient is found to have a tumor, the only thing the doctor discusses with that patient is what he intends to do about the tumor…no one ever asks how the patient is doing. In my medical training, I remember well seeing patients who were getting radiation and/or chemotherapy. The tumor would get smaller and smaller, but the patient would be getting sicker and sicker. At autopsy we would hear, ‘Isn’t that marvelous!  The tumor is gone!’  Yes, it was, but so was the patient.  How many millions of times are we going to have to repeat these scenarios before we realize that we are treating the wrong thing?

Tags: , , , ,







  • Write your comment within 150 characters.

  • Categories
  • Recognition Wall
    • Doug Blanchard: hello, my son has brain cancer and today UCSF told...
    • Ramona: Hi there Denise, this is Amber and Joe's camping f...
    • crystal: I enjoyed hunting for stuff to sell more than sell...
    • Mare: Love ya, love ya attitude......
    • Christy: Woo hoo! That is great! And I see you DID get some...

    Powered by WordPress

    Blossom Theme by RoseCityGardens.com